Monday, January 30, 2012

More Random Conference Reviews

The annoyance at this kind of thing apparently diminishes with time, as this only annoyed me for about ten minutes.

Reviewer C, are you insane? Actually Reviewer C seems like a quantitative person based on the comments, and half the paper is qualitative, which in the circles I travel in is a strength of analysis thing but if you're hard core one or the other you won't like it (and you'll be wrong).

MeasureRev ARev BRev CAv.
Quality of Theory Development/Literature Review 4423.3
Quality of Method and Analysis Employed 4323
Significance of the Findings 5323.3
Relevance to the SIG 5434
Quality of the Writing 5323.3

See also this entry on random reviews.