The annoyance at this kind of thing apparently diminishes with time, as this only annoyed me for about ten minutes.
Reviewer C, are you insane? Actually Reviewer C seems like a quantitative person based on the comments, and half the paper is qualitative, which in the circles I travel in is a strength of analysis thing but if you're hard core one or the other you won't like it (and you'll be wrong).
|Measure||Rev A||Rev B||Rev C||Av.|
|Quality of Theory Development/Literature Review||4||4||2||3.3|
|Quality of Method and Analysis Employed||4||3||2||3|
|Significance of the Findings||5||3||2||3.3|
|Relevance to the SIG||5||4||3||4|
|Quality of the Writing||5||3||2||3.3|
See also this entry on random reviews.