The annoyance at this kind of thing apparently diminishes with time, as this only annoyed me for about ten minutes.
Reviewer C, are you insane? Actually Reviewer C seems like a quantitative person based on the comments, and half the paper is qualitative, which in the circles I travel in is a strength of analysis thing but if you're hard core one or the other you won't like it (and you'll be wrong).
| Measure | Rev A | Rev B | Rev C | Av. | |
| Quality of Theory Development/Literature Review | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3.3 | |
| Quality of Method and Analysis Employed | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| Significance of the Findings | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3.3 | |
| Relevance to the SIG | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | |
| Quality of the Writing | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3.3 |
See also this entry on random reviews.
